Posts Tagged ‘Lloyd Kaufman’

Doing Time With Rolfe Kanefsky #2

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Rolfe KanefskyThere’s Nothing Out There was your calling card in a way. It got you in the door. Once you got in the door, what did you do next? Tomorrow By Midnight came a few years later. What did you do in the meantime?

Well, while we were finishing Nothing, I went back to Hampshire College for a semester and worked for a short period of time at a video store in New York. There’s Nothing Out There opened for a one week run at the 8th Street Playhouse in New York in January 1992. It was seen by some producers who were trying to complete a family adventure film entitled My Family Treasure. They liked Nothing and I was hired to help finish the film and shoot the New York footage with Dee Wallace, Theodore Bikel and Alex Vincent, the kid from Child’s Play 1 & 2. It was my first 35mm film working with professional actors. A good learning experience. With two movies under my belt, I made the move to Los Angeles.

Unfortunately, the studios weren’t banging down my doors. Studios and agents mostly didn’t quite understand There’s Nothing Out There so the offers for another film didn’t exactly flood in. I found a manager who got me some writing assignments. I was hired to rewrite a script entitled Red Line in 48 hours which was produced starring Chad McQueen (Steve’s son), Michael Madsen, Jan-Michael Vincent, Dom DeLuise, Corey Feldman, Roxanna Zal and Julie Strain. A star-studded B action movie.

Red LineThat was a killer cast!

Surprisingly, that also didn’t lead to much work—I’m being sarcastic here. After about three years in L.A., I started to get a little worried, so I tried to start a company dedicated to directing and editing scenes for actor’s demo reels with my friend/Nothing star, Mark Collver. He thought he’d be able to bring in the clients.

We made a few videos, but the business never took off. Luckily, it was around the time that I met a French producer named Alain Siritzky, famous for the official Emmanuelle series as well as other late-night Cinemax fare.

The work you did in, for lack of a better term, soft-core not only gave you a chance to hone your craft, it also allowed you to meet some people you’ve continued to work with—some really good actors. I’m referring to Robert Donavan and Gabriella Hall, among others.

Yes, I entered the world of extremely low-budget soft-core comedies in 1996 after meeting Alain Siritzky at the American Film Market in Santa Monica, California. He was about to produce a slate of 14 “soft-erotic” movies based on a famous comic book series created by artist Milo Manara: Click and Butterscotch.

Gabriella HallOh yeah! They’re constantly advertised in Heavy Metal.

I was actually aware of these adult comics and knew that I could make these films. A few years earlier, I had written a teen comedy script called Hormones that was somewhat inspired by elements in these comic books.

Alain had a deal with Roger Corman, and Corman’s people were writing and directing all of these movies. However, Alain was impressed by There’s Nothing Out There and wanted me on board. I felt, like you said, that these could be good small features to hone my craft and I was given a fair amount of freedom as long as I shot these 90-minute films in six days, on budget, and they had the proper amount of required nudity. So, basically, this really was the old Roger Corman training ground. I got to meet and have dinner with Corman, which I remember very well because a movie entitled Scream was about to come out and he was wondering if it would perform at the box office in December. Scream was a project that he had passed on years ago because of the humor. He did these kind of films straight. I had the same response when I was trying to get into Corman years earlier with Nothing as my calling card. Again, it was too humorous for them, which is strange because the original Little Shop of Horrors is one of Corman’s most famous ventures and was very successful. But Hollywood has always been cautious when it comes combining genre.

Good point.

Anyway, working on these series was quite a training ground. I was very involved in the casting because I needed actors who would be comfortable with the nudity but could also be funny. My scripts were very humorous in nature. Rod Steele 0014: You Only Live Until You Die was a James Bond parody and needed talented actors to pull it off. Luckily, I found Robert Donavan, Gabriella Hall and Kira Reed. I worked with all three of these actors many, many times. Gabriella became a good friend and we teamed up years later to produce a movie together called Jacqueline Hyde. I’m sure we’ll talk about that one another time.

Actually, yeah. I do want to get to Jacqueline Hyde.

Rod Steele 0014: You Only Live Until You DieRobert Donavan is one of the true undiscovered talents in Los Angeles. He has been in almost every single one of my movies since. I and everyone I know loves working with Robert.

I also found roles for Craig Peck and Mark Collver from There’s Nothing Out There in some of these flicks. Mark is great in Rod Steele and The Alien Files with Kira Reed. It was an interesting couple of years making these films with Alain, but I am still proud of some of these flicks and surprised how well they hold up. Especially my “R” rated director’s cuts. Some of these films are actually “respected” by bigger people in the industry. I heard David Duchovny enjoyed Alien Files, and John Cork, author of the massive book James Bond: The Legacy as well as the one in charge of all the special edition James Bond MGM DVDs, owns both the “R” and “Unrated” copies of Rod Steele and thought it was the best Bond parody he’s seen.

Wow, that’s a nice acknowledgement. You know, I guess most people don’t realize that there are some really good actors working in that genre, and that many of them just happened to find work there and kept going back to the well—a gig’s a gig for a working actor or director.

Yes, there are good actors in some of these pictures. In the old days of Hollywood, actors, directors, writers had deals with the studios who would develop their talent over time. It wasn’t a “one chance, make it or break it” situation like today. Then, luckily, in the ‘60s and ‘70s, producers like Roger Corman created a training ground situation and discovered some amazing talent. The list of people that he gave careers to is incredible. But by the ‘90s, that had dried up, so almost nobody was helping upcoming filmmakers.

Blonde and BlonderIt’s like an actor needs a demo reel to show an agent and producer what he/she can do. But how do you make a reel if you don’t have footage of film/television work to show? It’s like a Catch-22 situation. So, an actor/director/writer needs to take work were they can get it, and a lot of the time this comes from low-budget exploitation films.

I remember when I got involved with Siritzky, a lot of my filmmaker friends thought that it was a bad idea. They said I would get stuck in these kind of films, which some people do. But I was determined to use this as a stepping stone to make other films and genres. They were all stunned that I convinced Siritzky to produce a dark comedy thriller called Tomorrow By Midnight for almost a million-dollar budget, SAG actors, 35mm scope and it was far from a “soft erotic movie.”  But I knew Siritzky wanted to branch out as well, so in 1999 I made Tomorrow By Midnight. I also wrote a script at the time called Blonde and Blonder for Alain. That too was produced 10 years later starring Pamela Anderson and Denise Richards.

Ah yes, that’s a somewhat infamous flick in its own right. Tomorrow By Midnight is an amazing film, man. It was quite a change from There’s Nothing Out There, in technique and subject matter. It looks wonderful, where There’s Nothing Out There looks like a grindhouse flick. Is that totally attributable to a bigger budget?

Well, I made Tomorrow 10 years after I made Nothing. I was a more experienced filmmaker by then and Tomorrow was a much more personal film. It was really my first attempt at drama, but I had a very professional cast and crew. We held over 45 days of auditions to find that cast. We shot for 18 days, so it was actually a shorter schedule than Nothing and it was much smaller in scope. Mainly one location and six actors. I called it “Breakfast Club with guns” or “Clerks meets Dog Day Afternoon.”

Tomorrow By MidnightSome of the stories came from my days of working in that videos store back in New York. I wanted Tomorrow to have a very slick, polished look but wanted to avoid that whole shaky camera Homicide technique that was very popular at the time. I storyboarded most of the action in the film and had a good rehearsal period—video storyboarding again.

It was a smooth shoot where everything went right until the very end of the production when we were shooting the exteriors. It rained hard for two out of three of the nights with Carol Kane and we didn’t have insurance to wait and shoot on another day. We had to deal with the weather. It was very cold and wet. But the real problem was that in the movie, my characters talk about all the Hollywood films watering down the street to create that Miami Vice blue wet look. And with all the real rain we got, it started to look like I was doing the same thing.

So, I had to avoid showing the ground and kept a lot of the ending exteriors in tight close-ups so I wouldn’t be guilty of doing what I was making fun of.

Your cast was, again, composed of unknowns for the most part, but everyone gives a wonderful performance, and Alexis Arquette especially. I love his opening “killer” movie title bit.

Alexis Arquette and Carol Kane were the only two actors who didn’t audition for the movie. I knew Alexis’ work and was delighted when he read the script and agreed to do it. The opening “killer” movie title bit was fun to write. Actually, the whole script wrote very easily because a lot of the dialogue and conversation came from my own life and knowledge of movies. I wrote the screenplay in about two weeks. It was almost like a play, and we stuck to the script very closely. Everybody really enjoyed the dialogue. Actually, Alexis added the Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! line himself into the list of “Killer” titles. He asked if he could and I said “sure.”

Carol KaneYou mentioned When A Stranger Calls earlier. How did it feel to work with Carol Kane? She’s pretty much a legend.

Yes, Carol Kane was great. I loved the idea of going with a female hostage negotiator. I didn’t want there to really be any villains in the movie. It’s a tragedy that just can’t be stopped, but everyone is trying to do the right thing. I wanted a strong but motherly kind of character for Carol Kane. We worked on it a bit and I loved being able to tie in Dog Day Afternoon. Carol Kane’s first name in Tomorrow By Midnight is Jen, which is also her name as the hostage in Dog Day Afternoon. So, I threw in the idea that she is playing the same character and after her experience in the bank in Dog Day, she became a hostage negotiator to help others in similar situations. It’s an in-joke, but I thought it was kind of cool.

Oh yeah, that’s right. I always forget she was in that. When I think of her early work, I think of The Last Detail.

We did have a little talk about Scream and she said that Fred Walton, writer/director of When A Stranger Calls, was also a little annoyed by the “borrowing” of ideas for Scream. I am also a big fan of When A Stranger Call Back. Carol Kane told me that Fred Walton actually has a great script for a third sequel, but they could never get the money raised. Too bad, because I’d love to see it. I think Fred Walton is a very underrated filmmaker.

Roger CormanMy first thought about Tomorrow By Midnight is that it’s a sort of love letter to people that really know film.

Someone who didn’t like Tomorrow once described it as being trapped in Rolfe Kanefsky’s brain for an hour and a half. That’s pretty accurate. Yes, I do think that Tomorrow would appeal to film majors in NYU and USC. I worked hard to make their conversations believable and argued with the producers at times. They wanted the references to films to be a bit more mainstream to make sure everyone got it. I said that film majors are going to knock mainstream and talk about the little hard to find titles—the “discovery” movies that other people might not know about. Hence, the “Hitchcock/DePalma” discussion and the “Friday the 13th/Pulp Fiction” talk. It was fun to be able to bring up a lot of my issues about film and filmmakers. It’s all opinion but interwoven with a lot of film fact. I had a lot to say with Tomorrow but wanted to keep it entertaining so it would also work as a comedy and thriller at the same time. The crew had a great time shooting Tom’s “Roger Corman: Hero or Hack” monologue because most of the crew was from Corman and we were actually shooting in his downtown studios. Tomorrow By Midnight was one of the last films to be shot at “the lumber yard” [Corman’s legendary studio in Venice, CA, which was previously a lumber yard]. Unfortunately, much of Tom’s speech got cut because Siritzky was afraid it would offend Corman. It’s still in the deleted /extended scenes on that DVD I made.

Right, right.

Overall, Tomorrow is a love letter to movies but it is also an analysis of my hopes, dreams and regrets. For me, there is a deeper meaning to the movie. One of the lines that got cut is when Kira asks the real film buff, Tom, “Isn’t it strange, watching life rather than living it?” That was said to me in college and, unfortunately, I find the statement very truthful and sometimes depressing.

Alexis Arquette lays down the law in Tomorrow By MidnightWhen I think of you, I don’t think “political filmmaker,” but you aimed at and hit a lot of targets with this film. What inspired you to write this script?

Well, the idea for the script came out of frustration. I was with two filmmaker friends in a video store and we were complaining about how hard it is to raise money to make a film. We joked about taking a video store hostage to get the attention because even if we went to jail, when we got out, producers might want to give us money to make our story into a film. That was the germ of the idea.

Then Alain Siritzky came to me with an idea of shooting a film on video to make it look like found footage. This was actually before The Blair Witch Project. I pitched him my “Video Store” idea—VIDEO STORE…The Movie was the original title of the film. He liked it and paid me a little bit of money to write it. The entire film was to only be seen through the point of views of different surveillance cameras in and outside the store and then through the news reporters’ cameras when they arrive on the scene.

So, I sat down to write the script as a Clerks type of comedy but quickly realized that, unless all the dialogue was brilliant, two hours of just watching film students hang out and talk films in a video store might get very boring to anyone not obsessed with films. So, I decided that Tomorrow had to be about something more, and the issue of violence in movies versus violence in real life could be interesting.

I wrote this in 1997. Alain read it and didn’t want to make it. He thought it was just another typical hostage movie and he wasn’t interested. So, the project sat on a shelf for a few years. I was about to try to buy it back and make it myself when some other French producers came to Alain Siritzky looking to do a project. Alain gave them a few of my scripts and one person really responded to Tomorrow By Midnight, so suddenly the project was up and running again.

Such is the movie biz, eh?

On a personal side, a lot of the script came from issues in my professional life. After Scream and Kevin Williamson’s success, I didn’t know what to do. I had a similar voice but didn’t want people thinking that I was ripping him off. So, I tried to address the situation in Tomorrow by taking the whole movie reference dialogue a step further. I wanted to ask the audience, “Why do people speak through movies rather than speak to each other?” Take the whole self-reference idea to another level. That is a major theme in the movie.

Unfortunately, three months after we finished shooting the film, Columbine happened and our reps and PR people got very scared of the movie. They were afraid we were glamorizing kids with guns, when actually the movie was addressing that very issue. It became a hot topic and nobody wanted to get near the movie. This is why it was—and still to this day in the U.S.—never released. It is available is some places in Europe under the titles Midnight 5 and After Midnight.

Stanley Kubrick on the set of A Clockwork OrangeYou referenced A Clockwork Orange throughout the flick—one of my favorite movies, by the way. I’m sure this is a stupid question, but are you a big Kubrick fan?

Yes, I think every filmmaker has to respect the masters, and there’s no denying that Kubrick made some brilliant films. I knew from the beginning that this whole hostage situation had to begin with them trying to rent out A Clockwork Orange. If you’re dealing with issues about violence in today’s society, Clockwork Orange is the go-to movie. Again, I had a little fight with the producers about this because they thought the film was too old and the young audience wouldn’t know what it was. I argued and won. Three days before we began shooting, Kubrick died, so all of his films came back in a big way. It was sad but making this movie was a nice tribute to his memory and I’m proud of that.

On the DVD, you included an alternate ending for Tomorrow By Midnight. I really loved it, and it featured Lloyd Kaufman and Kira Reed. Why did you cut it?

Unfortunately, since almost nobody has seen this film because it is still not released, it tricky to talk about the ending. But a short answer to this question is that when we screened the film for a PR company, they felt that the film would be more powerful if we ended where the film ends now. The final scene they argued was anti-climatic. I felt that the original ending would let the audience take a breath so they could start discussing the film when they left the theaters. So, we compromised. I ended the film where they wanted it to end and then you hear the last scene during the end credit scroll.

I’m still on the fence. I agree it is a powerful way to end the movie, but I really like that last scene. At least on my homemade DVD, you can see the original ending. One day soon, I hope the film is really released so everybody can see it. It is still one of the films—if not the one film—I am most proud to have made in my career thus far.

No doubt. While watching it, I got an almost palpable feeling that the maker of this flick just flat-out loves movies, and that you made it for movie lovers. It made me feel like a member of a club.

Thanks. Obviously, I do love movies and watch way too many of them. My movie collection now is over 8,400. I have dedicated my entire life to making movies, for better or worse. I think it good to be passionate about something and I chose movies. I made Tomorrow just after turning 30 and felt very good to be making this film at that time in my life. It’s an important film for me and I hope others can appreciate it as well, when they can find it.

Oh, and speaking of members of a club, you and Quentin Tarantino and Kevin Smith all appeared out of nowhere around the same time [the early ‘90s], and you actually name-check them both in Tomorrow By Midnight. Do you consider yourself part of that early indie scene? Was their work—or that scene’s overall vibe—important to you at that time?

Well, I am a fan of both of them and have enjoyed most of their films. Their impact on the film business at that time is undeniable. Everyone was trying to make movies with that kind of dialogue. Once again, that was always my style as well. I love films from the ‘40s with Cary Grant. Still make all my actors watch His Girl Friday. Loved Danny Kaye flicks. So that screwball, fast-talking attitude is a part of me and my work. I was never trying to copy Tarantino or Kevin Smith, but you could not make a contemporary film about film majors and not have their names come up and their influence on the business.

A few years after I made the film, I went to a DVD signing of Dogma that Kevin Smith was attending and waited on line for over three hours to get it signed and see if he would check out a copy of Tomorrow By Midnight, which I brought with me. When I reached him, I said, “Hi, I’m Rolfe Kanefsky…” and he stopped me cold by saying—true story—“Wait. I know you. You directed a film called There’s Nothing Out There. I saw it when I was working in a video store in New Jersey. You know, I think Scream ripped you off, man.”

That is awesome!

I was floored and very impressed. He did take a copy of Tomorrow, but I don’t think he ever watched it. Over the years, I have heard from reliable sources that Tarantino also knows and enjoyed There’s Nothing Out There.

I bet he has. He’s seen everything.

And I just ran into Eli Roth, who knew the film and saw it when he was a student at NYU. So, I guess in an “under the radar” kind of way, I was part of that indie scene. I just never got the release or exposure that some of these other guys received. I’m always amazed when people tell me that they’ve seen my early work because many of these films, Tomorrow especially, are near impossible to find. I really hope one day that changes.

Bloodsucking FreaksI hope so too, because it’s a very good film. By the way, I notice that you have a poster for Bloodsucking Freaks in the video store in Tomorrow By Midnight. Would care to elaborate its significance? You were born into cult film royalty, were you not?

Many of the trailers and posters in the store have some kind of connection. The video store is loaded with films from Roger Corman, Full Moon and Troma. Trailers for Troma’s War and The Killer Eye play in the background. The poster for Tromeo and Juliet shows a young Tamara Craig Thomas [who plays Kira in Tomorrow By Midnight]. Tromeo was her first film. Brad Rushing was the director of photography on Full Moon’s Shrieker. That poster is also seen in the store. The theme song to Emmanuelle In Space plays in the background in the adult section of the store. And yes, Bloodsucking Freaks was edited by my father, Victor Kanefsky, who has many varied credits. In the cult horror world, he worked on Just Before Dawn, Blood Bath, Ganja & Hess and of course my flicks, There’s Nothing Out There, Jacqueline Hyde and Nightmare Man. He also edited Tomorrow By Midnight.

So, that comment of watching Tomorrow By Midnight is like being trapped in Rolfe Kanefsky’s head for 90 minutes is pretty accurate. I just hope people enjoy their visit.

~Theron Neel

Doing Time With Rolfe Kanefsky #1

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Rolfe KanefskyThere’s Nothing Out There looks like a pretty complicated film for a first-time director. What had you done to prepare yourself for the scope of a full-length feature?

Well, luckily, I became obsessed with films at the age of four when I discovered Abbott and Costello movies. I’ve always loved comedy and was really drawn to their monster movies like [Abbott and Costello] Meet Frankenstein, Meet The Mummy, Meet the Invisible Man, and Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.  When I was 13, I got my first video camera and began making home movies. My first official short was called Breaking and Entering and was an attempt to do comedy/horror combining my love for slapstick and a slasher film. At 16, I began working as a P.A. (production assistant aka slave) on independent films in New York, which included a slasher flick called Posed For Murder and the infamous Troma’s War.  I also decided to make my first full-length feature, a comedy/action/thriller entitled Strength in Numbers. It became a near two-hour epic that took me two years to complete. After that, for my senior project in high school, I decided to write and direct a full-length comedy murder mystery play called Murder In Winter as well as make a movie of it. So, I graduated high school with two feature-length home movies under my belt. I then did a few 8mm shorts at Hampshire College which were both “horror” oriented—one of which plays on the screen at the video store in the opening scene of There’s Nothing Out There. At this point, I felt that I was ready to make my first real feature and luckily my parents agreed. Before graduating high school, I had written There’s Nothing Out There in 1987 as an exercise to see how long it would take me to write a teen exploitation horror flick. I decided to make it a creature film and then thought it would be fun to have the lead character be an expert in horror films, like I was and still am.

You see, when I was 14, I had made up my mind that I wanted to be a director and realized that most first-time directors had started with horror. So, I began renting every horror film on video. The Evil Dead made a big impression on me, so I thought the cabin in the woods concept with a movie buff who warns everyone of the mistakes they make in horror films would be a good idea. I had never seen that done before but had loved the modern funny/scary takes on classic stories, like Fright Night and An American Werewolf In London. So, with that inspiration and my love for Abbott and Costello and Peter Sellers’ Pink Panther movies, I made There’s Nothing Out There in the summer of 1989 with the help of my parents and some private investors. My goal was to satirize the dumb clichés of many horror films, but not insult the genre which I loved. I just wanted to poke fun at all the stupid conventions, like the cat scare, and dumb things that people only do in horror films: stand in front of an open window, drop the knife, wander off into a basement or the woods by themselves, etc. I thought if I made a send-up of those clichés, then filmmakers would have to get smarter and come up with better stories and ways of scaring the audience—stop them from being lazy, in my opinion.

How long did the shoot last?

The shoot was 24 days starting in August. We finished in the beginning of September and the entire film was completed with post production about a year later. Overall, it went pretty smoothly. I was 20 at the time and, along with the lead actor, I was the youngest guy on the set.

There's Nothing Out ThereAs a first-time feature director, what was the one big thing that surprised you, that you weren’t prepared for?

Well, I was pretty well prepared and delighted to have a real crew. With all of my other home movies, I was doing just about everything myself. So, it was much easier since I didn’t have to move lights, operate the camera, hold the boom mic and try to wrangle all my friends to act in my films. Professionals were a pleasure to work with. And I also had a nice three weeks of prep with my cast. I spent a week in rehearsals and made a very detailed shot list. The second week, we went to a dance studio where I staged most of the fight scenes and action, to make sure that nobody would get hurt. The third week, I went to the real location and shot almost the entire film on video. So, I basically video storyboarded the whole film. You can see some of this on the special features of the DVD release.

It was a lot of work, but I got most of what I was aiming for. The biggest problem I had was with one of the actresses who had never been in a film before and a few days into the production, realized that making a movie is hard work. She didn’t understand that films were not usually shot in order and thought we were doing it just to torture her. She wanted out and made everyone’s life on the set very difficult. But, in a way, it helped bond the rest of the cast and crew. Many times you need a villain on the set, which helps everyone else come together when they have a common enemy. She became that villain. Again, on the DVD commentary track, I tell a lot more stories about her. To this day, she’s the only actor I’ve ever really had a problem working with.

There’s Nothing Out There has a couple of classic signs of a low-budget debut: it has an unknown cast and it was shot in basically one setting. All the kids are surprisingly good. Where did you find your cast?

We hired a casting director in New York. A man by the name of Bill Williams. Most of the actresses were models who wanted to act but had no experience. We found the entire cast through those auditions, except for the lead, Craig Peck. I went to high school with Craig, and he was the lead in my Murder In Winter, so I knew he could do it. He auditioned as well and landed the part. I was very happy with the cast, until the one actress began causing problems. But all the rest were real troupers and gave 100%. Unfortunately, only Mark Collver who played Jim went on to a film and television career. I worked with him a few more times in Los Angeles. He’s still a good friend and now a talented novelist as well. Hopefully, his book will be published soon. And for those interested, the lead skinny-dipping punker is a guy named Cy Voris who went on to become a very successful writer, with Tales From The Crypt: Demon Knight, Bulletproof Monk and creator of the series Sleeper Cell being just a few of his credits.

Separated at birth?When Bonnie Bowers came onscreen, I thought, “I didn’t know Jewel Shepard was in this!” Is it just me, or did you notice the resemblance too?

I know who Jewel Shepard is, and she actually auditioned for me years later on another project, but I never saw Bonnie as Jewel at the time. Didn’t make the connection. Although, I’m sure Jewel would have been a lot easier to work with.

[Laughs] Though most of the flick is set at the house by the pond, you also shot in a high school. How did you swing that?

It was a middle school in Piedmont in upstate New York. School was out of session and it was a half-day shoot. We shot all that stuff plus all of the video store opening on the same day. We got a bunch of extras and a lot of young-looking crew members to be the students. It was a long day but went pretty smoothly…until we wrapped. This was a non-union shoot and the teamsters got wind of the production. I remember the grip truck had to drive around, trying to lose them, before returning to the main house in the woods location so they wouldn’t know where we were shooting and cause problems. Luckily, that was our only run-in with the teamsters.

Yeah, those teamsters deserve a horror flick of their own. By my count, you trashed two cars in There’s Nothing Out There—pretty costly for a first film.

I really enjoyed the car crashes, but both had problems. The first crash, when Sally drives off the road into the woods, we built a big ramp and had a stunt driver do it. The crew decided to make a bet on how far the car would go. This was a bad idea because the stunt driver himself went in on the bet and he won because he hit the ramp going about 20 miles faster than he was supposed to. Jumped the car 44 feet and landed right on one of our cameras! You can see the shot in the movie. The car comes right into the lens before breaking it. That cost us some money.

Yikes indeedYikes!

The second stunt, when the white car flips into the pond, also did not go as planned. A pipe ramp was built with a rig to get the car going fast enough so it would jump and flip around in mid-air before hitting the water. There was no driver for this stunt. Unfortunately, the car was in pretty bad shape and couldn’t get enough speed on the grass and dirt. The car hit the ramp, flipped on its side but didn’t make it to the pond. It was supposed to be the last day of the shoot, so we were all depressed because we knew we had to come back and reshoot the scene with another car, which we did. The second car kind of worked, although it’s pretty easy to tell that it’s a different car. It landed in the edge of the water.  We then had to knock it over and push it further into the pond to film it sinking. Luckily, since the film is a horror/comedy, the “transforming car” is accepted as one of the jokes in the film. So, it works despite the mistakes.

Rehearsal? Hearse, maybe...Truthfully, I didn’t even notice! What did you learn from your first feature? What did you take away that you were able to apply to your next film, be it technical, political or logistical?

Well, you learn a lot on every film. The main thing it did was prove to me and everyone else that I could make a real movie. Much of what I did on that shoot, I still do today. Rehearsal is key. A good plan and shot list is crucial. Video storyboarding is a great tool. I always try to push the boundaries of the budget and be ambitious. We had steadicam, crane, dollies and handheld on that film. I love moving the camera and really use all the “toys” when I can. I think I’m a very visual filmmaker but also know that the most important element is the performances. If you don’t care about the characters on the screen, it doesn’t matter how slick and beautifully lit your film is.

I also learned to trust my instincts. The famous “boom pole swing” gag came out of a logistical problem. In the script, the character of Nick was supposed to escape the creature by grabbing a chandelier and swinging out of the room. Unfortunately, our location didn’t have a chandelier, so I kept trying to figure out how to do this stunt. I went to a movie one night where they projected the film incorrectly. It was too low and the tops of the set and microphones could be seen in almost every shot. The audience was hysterical. Having seen so many low-budget horror films on video, I was used to crew shadows and mistakes in many of these films so I thought it might be fun to break the fourth wall for a second. Have the character stand up, and when he does, the camera tilts up and reveals the microphone boom pole in the frame. I thought the audience will think it’s a mistake, this being another low-budget film, and then surprise them by having the actor see the pole himself and actually use it to swing out of the room to avoid the creature!

The entire crew was against me on this idea. They said, “This is not a Mel Brooks film. You can’t cross the line and let people know it’s a movie.” I thought it would work and luckily, my father, Victor Kanefsky, who was the main producer and editor, trusted me and let me do it. I know a studio would never have let that gag be shot. But I did it, and it became probably the most famous and talked about moment in the movie.

You can NOT do the boom gag!Yeah, I loved that gag, but I have to admit it did surprise me.

So, ever since then, whenever there is a scene that everyone is worried about, I know that I have to do it because it’s the scene that people are going to respond to and talk about. This has happened time and again. In a film I did called The Hazing, there’s a scene with a giant tongue that everyone thought was going too far and wanted me to cut it. I refused and it too has become one of the best moments in the movie.

Oh yeah, possessed tongue fu! Loved it!

So, as a filmmaker, you have to trust yourself and try to follow your own path. You’ll never get great by always playing it safe.

Well said, man. All right, I hear you have a special re-release of the film planned for next year. What can you share with us about it?

Well, it looks like we’re going to be doing a special 20th Anniversary release of There’s Nothing Out There with Troma Entertainment. Lloyd Kaufman has always been a fan of Nothing and wanted the film when it was first made. I have stayed in touch with Lloyd all of these years and even put him in cameo roles in some of my later films. So, I think the time is right and they could do a good release, making it more available than it’s ever been. There’s Nothing Out There has always been one of those hard-to-find underground movies and has built up a slight cult following, maybe because of that. So, Troma seems like the perfect fit.

Just remember who the real star isThat’s true. I’m sure Lloyd will take care of it.

I hope all the special features from the last release will be on the DVD, including the commentary track with myself, some of the actors and some of the crew. All the deleted/extended scenes, the animated still gallery, the original trailer, the video storyboard comparisons, the audition footage including some body checks, rehearsals, bloopers, animated opening title test, and maybe a new featurette entitled “Fond Remembrances of Nothing – 20 Years Later.”  There is also a book I wrote called Making Nothing At the Age of 20. It’s on the website (www.theresnothingoutthere.com). If we can figure out a way to link it with the new DVD, that would be great. It was written to inspire other struggling filmmakers and let them know how I did it. And maybe I’ll record a new commentary track just for the hell of it. We’ll see. But it should be packed with goodies if all goes as planned.

That sounds amazing! Okay, last question. One of the central ideas of the script (one of the characters is a horror fan and constantly warns what will happen based on the horror films he’s seen) was “borrowed” a few years later for the bigger-budget Scream. Any diplomatic thoughts?

Ah, the Scream story. A lot has been said on this topic and, believe it or not, I did not start it. I remember hearing about Scream and thinking that some of it sounds kind of familiar. When the trailer came out, I began getting calls from a lot of friends and people who worked on There’s Nothing Out There who though Scream had copied my movie. When I saw Scream, I enjoyed it a lot. The opening reminded me of When A Stranger Calls or, if you want to go back further, the original Black Christmas. Scream was definitely a much scarier film than Nothing. However, I did think Jamie Kennedy’s portray of “Randy” had some similarities to Craig Peck’s “Mike” in Nothing. I saw the connection but didn’t make much out of it. However, a few years later I found a horror movie review book that reviewed Scream and said, “Didn’t it just rip off a movie called There’s Nothing Out There?” Then I started seeing comments on the internet and realized that other people had made the connection between the two films.

Which movie are we in?Now, there is more to the Scream connection than I want to talk about right now. I do believe and have some pretty good proof that Wes Craven did see Nothing before he made Scream. I do not know if Kevin Williamson ever saw it, but Nothing was playing on cable a lot around the time he was writing Scream. So, it’s a possibility. Over the years, the reputation of Nothing has grown and more people have agreed on the connection, saying that my film may have “inspired” Scream.

But, I am a big fan of Scream, and it proved that I was on the right track. In 1990, when we were trying to sell Nothing and find distribution, the studios couldn’t get a handle on the film. They thought it was too scary to be funny and too funny to be scary. But the public and critics really liked the movie. It played a lot of film festivals and received a lot of rave reviews. It was great but frustrating because nobody would take a chance on releasing this little no-name movie. But I knew right then that if someone came along and made a film like this for enough money with a name actor or two in it, it could make a fortune. Scream proved me right and it also brought back the horror genre, which was great for everyone. And because of the success of Scream, years later I was able to make The Hazing and then Jacqueline Hyde, Nightmare Man, etc.

So, I have no hard feelings towards Scream. I wish we could have seen a bit of Scream’s profits and that There’s Nothing Out There would have been a bigger help to my career as a way into the Hollywood doors, but I was little ahead of my time. So, I keep plugging away, trying to make the best movies I can for as much money as I can get. It’s never been easy, but I still love what I do and hope to keep doing a lot more.

Well, that’s definitely the most important thing, my friend…

~Theron Neel

Dark Reel

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Dark ReelI really don’t know where to start with Dark Reel (2007), directed by Josh Eisenstadt and written by Eisenstadt and Aaron Pope. I’d like to think that this is one of those movies that looked good on the page, but got lost in translation to the screen. But that would ignore the fact that although this flick starts well, it totally falls apart as it goes. I chose this film for review based on its Netflix description and its cast. This is where I went wrong. If I’ve learned anything over the years, it’s that an intriguing summary and an appealing cast do not guarantee a good film. But over and over, I make this same mistake, never to learn. Perhaps that’s what it is to be a fan. But perhaps that’s what it is to be a fool.

Maybe I can get a handle on this movie if I break it down into its parts. Let’s begin with the plot. In 1953, a young starlet named Scarlett May was murdered. In 2006, it seems her killer is back, terrorizing the cast and crew of Pirate Wenches, an awful low-budget film from the unctuous Connor Pritchett (Lance Henriksen), owner of a floundering studio. Fanboy Adam Waltz (Edward Furlong) has won a walk-on in the film, which stars B-movie queen Cassie Blue (Tiffany Shepis). Who could the killer be? Could it be the creepy paparazzo that seems to be at each crime scene? Maybe it’s the film’s director, who seems to resent Pritchett’s meddling? Is it a coincidence that as cast members begin to die, Adam’s role gets bigger and Connor Pritchett’s movie gets more publicity? Yes, red herrings abound as this confused feature stumbles to a close. Unfortunately, you’ll have to sit through the whole 108 minutes to find out the murderer’s identity.

Tiffany ShepisLet’s move on to the performers. Admittedly, for me this flick’s biggest draw was Tiffany Shepis. The reigning queen of the scream and B-movie goddess, Shepis is also the hardest-working and best low-budget actress out there. Hell, according to IMDb, she has 20 films in various stages of completion right now. Since she got her start as a teen in 1996 working as a regular in Troma films, she’s amassed a staggering 88 credits. And while Shepis knows what sells B movies and is a good sport about making with the gratuitous nudity, she is often the best actor in any of her films. In the recent Bonnie & Clyde vs. Dracula—which I plan on reviewing soon—she does the best work of her career. In Dark Reel, Shepis is essentially playing herself, and one scene in particular must’ve hit home for her: In an argument with studio-owner Connor Pritchett, Cassie Blue lets him know that she’s the only reason any of his crappy movies make any money at all. Replace Connor Pritchett with Troma head Lloyd Kaufman and you very likely have a scene from Shepis’ life.

I suppose the producers needed a big name for their film, so they hired Edward Furlong. I mean, he was in Terminator 2, and that was a big one…in 1991. And now, Edward Furlong is a big one. I don’t mean to be mean, but in Dark Reel he looks like he ate a Volkswagen Beetle. Eddie baby, what happened? That aside, I’ve never cared for Furlong. His acting is one-note at best (he plays whiny and weasely quite well). He’s no different here. Oh well, at least he’s still working.

Tony Todd and Rena RiffelOn paper, the supporting cast in Dark Reel is what sealed the deal for me. I’m always eager to see Lance Henriksen in anything. Even his very brief uncredited cameo in Jennifer’s Body made me sit up and smile. But here, he makes me wince and look away. Although he does what he can with this badly written role, it’s still painful to watch. He has a few good moments and his character plays a large part in the story, so I’m sure it was a gig he couldn’t turn down. Henriksen is almost 70 years old now and I was going to say his career must be slowing down but, again according to IMDb, I see he has 10 projects in the works at the moment. Go Lance!

Appearing as the detectives assigned to the case, Tony Todd and Rena Riffel are both great in the limited amount of screen time they receive. Todd is a veteran character actor best known for the Candyman films. Riffel is probably best known by trash film fans for her role in Showgirls. She’s also made a bit of a splash with her recent cult film, Trasharella—which I also plan on reviewing soon. As partners in Dark Reel, they complement each other winningly. I’d like to see their characters get their own movie. I’m sure it would be better than this one.

Edward Furlong, then and nowAll I can really say about the film’s direction is that it’s inconsistent. Josh Eisenstadt has given us some nice images, but the film itself is a jumble of confused storytelling, inconsistent performances and wavering tone. Again, if it’s not on the page, it’s not going to end up on the screen.

Okay, breaking it down into pieces didn’t help me at all, but maybe it helped you. Wow, I’ve blathered on for more than 800 words trying to work this out, so it’s definitely time to wrap up. According to the marketing copy, Dark Reel promised a “ticket to terror.” But what I got was a ticket to boredom, with a layover in disappointment and a connection to frustration. With low-budget horror films, you pay your money and you take your chances, but that’s not really the trip I wanted to take. Of course, the real question is, am I going to make the same mistake again? You know what they say: once a fool, always a fool.

~Theron Neel

Elske McCain—Ready for anything

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

elske1You’ve no doubt heard that you can’t judge a book by its cover. If you don’t believe it, see actress/filmmaker Elske McCain. At first glance, Elske is the ultimate horror vixen—all lush body and sultry stare. But talk with her for a few minutes and you begin to see the truth: Elske is actually a geek princess, exceedingly articulate and knowledgeable about the horror films she loves. In other words, she’s a fanboy’s dream. I recently wrangled Elske into a conversation about filmmaking, scream queens and nature run amok.

Hi Elske, thanks for chatting! I’d like to start by welcoming you to the “Unusual First Name Club.” Is Elske your real name?

Hi! Yes, Elske is my real name. My mother was born in Norway and moved to the states in the 1960s. My name means “love” or “the act of loving someone” in Norwegian. It is pronounced El-ska, not El-skie, as many people have mispronounced over the years.

It’s a lovely name. So, you seem to be pretty busy these days. Can you give me a list of all the projects on your plate at the moment?

As you know, the movie in which I produce and star, Jessicka Rabid, is currently in post [production]. It should be ready towards the year’s end [2008], and hopefully will screen at Tromadance New Mexico, possibly Tromadance in Park City, Utah, not to mention some other festivals. The Loft Cinema in Tucson has also expressed interest in showing the film. Other than Jessicka Rabid, I have been asked to be a part of a documentary on scream queens, directed by Fabien Martorell, the same director who just recently completed the Troma documentary Tromatized: Meet Lloyd Kaufman. I have also been asked to film a horror movie in November called Farmer Joe.

elske5You started as a dancer, right? Have you always had aspirations to be an actress, or did you just kinda stumble across this career direction?

Movies have always been my love. Becoming an actress was pretty much one of those “right place at the right time” cases. Even though I had done some extra work as a kid on some productions, it wasn’t until almost ten years later that I got back into the acting game.

You are constantly described as a “scream queen,” which I think is cool. Do you have a problem with that term? I know some actresses consider it demeaning.

I really do not have a problem with it. I’m pretty honored to be considered a scream queen, though I will agree that the term is very much overused these days. Much like the term “grindhouse” is now commonly used to describe exploitation films, “scream queen” now seems to be the term to use to describe any actress who does mainly horror films. In my eyes, the true scream queens are Linnea Quigley, Brinke Stevens, et cetera. Horror actresses from the 80’s who have stood the test of time.

elske4Speaking of scream queens, do you have any personal faves? Are there any ladies out there you consider to be role models?

I will have to say my favorite scream queens are Linnea Quigley and Linda Blair. As a child, whenever I would see Linnea’s name on a movie, I would rent it no matter what it was, because to me that was a sign that it was going to be a fun movie. I also really dig Linda Blair. Ever since I was young, people would tell me I looked like her, so I have followed her career very closely. I have yet to meet either of these women, so I am looking forward to the day that I do. Though she may not be considered a “scream queen”  in the traditional sense, Dee Wallace was very instrumental in my early acting career; she gave me a lot of encouragement, and without her kind words, I might not have gotten back into acting at all.

You’re a horror fan from way back, right? What’s your first horror-related memory?

I remember I watched The Hand at a very young age. Everyone in my family would try to scare the hell out of me by hiding behind a wall with nothing exposed but their hand. Another similar memory was the movie Alligator. I was frightened to death of the scene where the little boy falls off of the diving board into the pool only to be eaten by the alligator. I didn’t go anywhere near diving boards for many years. I remember one time as a kid, I had watched Friday the 13th and, shortly after, I would go swimming in the pool pretending to be young Jason popping out of the water and attempting to scare whoever was with me.

elske7You have worked your way up in fright flicks. Lots of small roles to start, but that’s changing. You are now doing what a lot of women in horror are doing—taking control and creating their own projects. Do you have some insight on this?

I’m what I like to call an “accidental” producer. I was on a few sets and when problems would arise, I would be the one to solve them—thus, becoming an associate producer. After hanging out with so many filmmakers and seeing what they do, I realized, “Hey I can do that too.”

Horror used to be a bit of an “old boys” network. But recently, women writers and directors are everywhere, which is awesome. Why is now the time, do you think, for women to emerge as a force in horror?

Now is just as good a time as any. In the past, most of the women in horror were just the “scream queens.” I figure the current trend of women in horror might be due to the video boom of the ‘80s, which led to more women growing up into horror fans. Better late than never, I say.

I recently spoke with Scott Phillips, who directed you in Gimme Skelter. I loved you in that flick, by the way. Actually, you had the best line, if not the best scene, in the film. How was it working with Gunnar Hansen, the original Leatherface?

Gunnar Hansen was really cool, and very supportive. The first scenes I shot for the movie were with him, and he made sure to make me feel very comfortable and [he] rehearsed with me ahead of time to make sure we both knew our lines.

elske3How many of your heroes have you had the chance to work with so far? Any special memories?

Working with [Troma Studios founder] Lloyd Kaufman on the scene I did for Poultrygeist was a dream come true. I have worked with Trent Haaga a few times, and I will credit him with honing my acting skills. I also directed Uwe Boll for a cameo in Jessicka Rabid. He was extremely happy to take part, which in turn made me feel even more confident as a filmmaker.

Now, you and [horror goddess] Tiffany Shepis are good friends, right? I bet the town isn’t even safe when you two go out.

Tiffany and I have been known to party pretty hard when we were hanging out in Tucson. Like myself, she is crazy and fearless, which when combined with alcohol results in fun times!

Are there any plans for you and Tiffany to work together? I know we’d all love to see that.

Unfortunately, me and Tiffany have not yet had the opportunity to work together on any films. The odds are in our favor that, someday soon, we will probably work together on something. I think the fans would really love to see us collaborate.

Definitely! So, you live in Tucson, right? Do you like being away from the craziness of L.A.?

Funny you mention this. I have recently relocated to L.A. I had pretty much exhausted all of the resources Tucson had to offer and now feel that, with the current career path I have taken, it only makes sense to be here in Los Angeles.

Oh, wow, that’s an exciting change…and totally blows my next question. But I’ll ask it anyway. There seems to be quite an underground horror scene forming in the New Mexico/Arizona area. Am I correct about that?

I think a lot of this has to do with geographically being so close to California. Also, the Tromadance New Mexico festival that is held in Albuquerque every year helps to corral these indie film resources, which in turn has led to a cult film phenomena in the Southwest. 

elske2Now that you’ve gotten a taste of working on your own projects, do you have anything else planned in the pipeline? 

I have been co-writing a script called The RollerBoogey Man with my best friend Cisiany Olivar. We were working on the movie when we realized that we had lost our original investor. I still plan on finishing the film someday. We have also had much interest in doing a sequel to Jessicka Rabid, even though the first one is not out yet. This sounds like it could be really fun, but in all honesty, I have been living and breathing Jessicka Rabid for about a year and a half, so I think I may need a little break.

You’re in Amy Lynn Best’s great new flick, Splatter Movie. Did you enjoy working with her?

Oh yes! After encountering a bizarre situation on my first experience with a female director, it was refreshing to work with Amy. She took great care of us and made sure we were all comfortable during all of our scenes.

Was Amy’s set different than the male-centric sets you’ve worked on?

I wouldn’t really classify it as “different,” but she was very organized, which is not always the case on every film set.

That’s putting it mildly. Now, I’d be remiss if I didn’t ask you a little more about Lloyd Kaufman. How’s he doing? His recent Poulterygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead tour was quite a success.

Lloyd is doing great. He is one of my strongest allies in the film world. I still ask him for advice when needed, and he has been extremely supportive in my quest to stand out from the pack of scream queens in order to be known as a filmmaker. The last I hear, he is gearing up for the DVD release of Poultrygeist, and now I am hearing that he is going to return to the director’s seat to make Toxic Avenger 5!

elskeToxie returns!? You read it here first, people. Elske, I hear that you love the “nature run amok” horror genre. Me too!  My favorite is Night of the Lepus. I mean, Janet Leigh, Rory Calhoun and giant mutant bunny rabbits? What’s not to love, right? What’s your favorite?

My favorite has got to be Devil Dog: The Hound of Hell. The idea that the family pet can turn into a deadly menace is intriguing. I also like Day of the Animals. Also, any movie with killer spiders in it makes me crazy. I have always hated spiders.

Oooh, yeah! Devil Dog! I love TV movies from the ‘70s! Okay, so what’s next for you, lady?

Honestly, I just hope to continue to make the kinds of movies I like, with the people I like. I am always up for challenging projects, so I am ready for anything.

Well, I know we all wish you the best of luck. By the way, I know you have a website. Where can we find you online?

I am currently revamping my old website, so it is offline for now. In the meantime, the best place to find me is at my MySpace page.

Okay, Elske, thanks so much for talking to us. Is there anything you want to hit on that we haven’t mentioned?

I will just take this opportunity to thank everybody who has helped me so far, and I will do my best not to disappoint any of my fans. Thanks, guys!

No, thank you, Elske. It’s our pleasure.

~Theron Neel

Trent Haaga—Expanding his horizons

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

trenthaaga1Trent Haaga has been knocking around the world of independent horror for almost a decade. He got his start, doing anything and everything, at Troma Entertainment, Lloyd Kaufman’s infamous production house. Though primarily known as an actor, Haaga has recently found success as a screenwriter—Deadgirl, a film he wrote, made the rounds at festivals with much success and recently opened in limited release around the country. Haaga’s latest acting role is in Timothy Friend’s new film, Bonnie & Clyde vs. Dracula. I was able to chat with Haaga a while ago about the past, the present and the future.

Hey Trent, thanks for taking the time to chat. Your latest role is Clyde Barrow in Timothy Friend’s cool new flick, Bonnie & Clyde vs. Dracula. How did you get involved in this project?

I basically just got a call for that one. I had never met Tim and Jenn Friend before, but I guess that they had seen me in some movies before. Jeff Sisson, their makeup FX guy, is one of my closest friends, and I think that he kind of put the bug in their ear.

It’s been doing very well on the festival circuit, garnering lots of praise and awards. Have you been at any of the festivals?

I have not had the chance to see the film with a crowd yet. The Friends sent me a DVD of the film a few months ago and that’s been my only exposure to it.

trenthaaga2Is this the first time you’ve played a historical character? Did you do any research on Clyde, or did you just go by what was on the page?

Yes, and that’s one of the main things that attracted me to the project. It’s not often that a low-budget production attempts a period piece—they’re just too expensive to do by nature. So I was excited to shoot something that didn’t take place in the “Now.” I didn’t really do any research on Clyde. As far as I know, he never fought Dracula.

Well, I fear we’ll never know for sure. Tiffany [Shepis] was really great as Bonnie. You two have a lot of chemistry together. How long have you known Tiffany?

I guess that’s a testament to her acting ability! Tiffany and I have been in the same movie several times, but Bonnie & Clyde vs. Dracula was the first time that we had any actual scenes together.

trent haagaThose early days at Troma have taken on an almost mythic quality, kind of like the Wild West of filmmaking. I’m sure the reality was much less glamorous, right?

It was glamorous to me. Just making movies was exciting. And making movies with one of my cinematic heroes [Lloyd Kaufman] was even better. But, yeah, it’s not what anyone would call “glamorous” by any definition of the word. But there was definitely a sense of being some sort of punk rock pioneer while we were doing those movies. Everything’s working against you when you make a movie like that, and they only get made through sheer force of will and persistence.

The great thing about Troma, I suppose, is the opportunity it gave you to learn everything about filmmaking from the ground up. You had almost every job possible at one time or another, right? From crew member to producer, you did it all.

Lloyd will basically give you any and all responsibility that you are willing to take on. I saw working for Troma as an opportunity to learn everything I could about making films—from writing through to post-production. Then I had to un-learn a lot of it! But what Troma did teach me for sure was the ability to keep going no matter what you have up against you.

And these days, though you’re known primarily as an actor, you also write and produce. How do you decide what you’re going to? Do you just field offers as they come in? Do you find properties to develop?

The acting thing just happened by accident—I went in to be an extra in Terror Firmer and landed a plum role in the film. Once that came out and was somewhat popular, I started to get acting offers. I always knew that I wanted to work in the movies and didn’t really care what I was doing—which is why I’ve done everything from Production Assistant to Producer. I generally field offers as they come in, but have always written scripts and have had the good fortune to have a handful of those made, too. 

So, is directing in your future? You’ve done everything else. It seems like the next logical step.

Ultimately, yes. I used to want to make another extremely low budget film that I direct…but I feel like I’ve done that already—made extremely low-budget films before. Now my plan of attack is to sell some scripts and eventually get someone to pony up a real budget. 

trenthaaga3I have to say, man, as an actor you have this quality that allows you to make any character you play likable, no matter how despicable they may be. I actually felt a little sorry for your character in Jessicka Rabid. How do you do this? Is this just the natural Haaga charm?

I think that, no matter what kind of character you play, you have to understand that they’re real people that have all the qualities of a real person—good and bad. Marley Hoffman, my character in Jessicka Rabid, is truly a terrible person. But maybe he doesn’t recognize how horrible he is…especially compared to the people that he lives with and interacts with. I may not agree with what all of my characters do, but it’s my job to try and understand them as they do these things—to view them as real people. Certainly having a cool script and an understanding director always helps this. 

You know Elske McCain from your Troma days too, right? How was working on Jessicka Rabid with her and [director] Matthew Reel?

I had actually shot a film with Elske and Matt that never came out, so Jessicka Rabid was just like old times. And it’s a real family vibe—small cast and crew, working in people’s homes. Makes the film feel more intimate. Comfortable and fun.

That’s quite an intense film. How was the mood on the set? Was it extra-jovial to offset the grim subject matter?

Well, we’re all kind of twisted individuals at heart, so once a scene was done, it was right back into fun and games. The vibe on set was very relaxed and friendly.

You are very much a proponent of independent film. Would you love a chance to appear in a big-budget flick? Or does your heart belong to the indies?

Let’s be realistic here. I’ve done a ton of ultra-low budget films and I love the spirit in which they’re made. But I’m a family man with a wife and kid. Money becomes an issue. If I won the lottery, it probably wouldn’t matter as much, but I’d like to expand my horizons and have the subsequent paycheck that comes with a larger movie. I’d also like to know what it’s like to make a movie without budgetary compromise—just to see what it’s like!

deadgirlI’d like to ask you about Deadgirl, Trent. This is an original script of yours, right?

Absolutely. It’s the first “spec” script that I managed to set up—every other script that I’ve had made has been based on someone else’s ideas or characters or for the money. Deadgirl was something I wrote on my own time and on my own dime.

The film is getting amazing reviews and winning awards. This has to be very exciting for you.

Absolutely. It’s edifying to know that this is one of my most critically and commercially successful projects and it’s something that came from a place of pure creation. I wasn’t doing it for the money or for the gig. And it’s a lot closer, thematically, to the kind of things I’d like to do more of or be known for. Don’t get me wrong, I love Troma and don’t regret my time there at all, but Troma is Lloyd’s company and I get tired of being Trent “Troma” Haaga. It’s great to think that soon I might get to be Trent “Deadgirl” Haaga instead.

[Laughs] I promise to always think of you that way from now on. Can you tell us a little about the story?

I like to say that it’s The River’s Edge meets A Simple Plan with a zombie sex slave.

Now I ask you, what could be better than that?  And this particular story seems to be hitting a lot of nerves and connecting with people, which is what being a writer is all about.

100% so. There’s nothing worse than making something that’s met with a general air of indifference…and I’ve made quite a few projects like that in my time!

Deadgirl has been really galvanizing audiences. Some seem to really love it; some seem to really hate it. Some think that it’s an exercise in misogyny; some see it as a statement against misogyny. Some are moved, some offended. But the main thing seems to be that it’s affecting people. People have been debating it and talking about what it means and deciding on its artistic merit, etc. And that’s what good art is supposed to do—inspire debate and thought. I wrote a film called Hell Asylum that moved a lot of units. And people generally said things like, “It was okay” or “I didn’t really like it.” There was no passion for the film, no real love or hate for it. That indifference is more painful than passionate hate, in my opinion.   

I agree. Was there any particular inspiration for Deadgirl?

I wrote Deadgirl right after we finished Citizen Toxie. I was kind of burned out on scatological superhero sex gore comedy. I needed to do something that I felt was more personal to me as a writer. And we had just shot a movie in upstate New York where locations were abundant and cheap. I actually wrote Deadgirl around two of the locations we had shot Citizen Toxie at: a high school and an abandoned mental institution. So those locations were important to the process. The rest of it came from the “troubled teen” movies that I really love and the kind of dead-end kids that I grew up with in small towns in the Midwest.

I actually wrote the film for Lloyd. He was wanting to return to Poughkeepsie and shoot a really quick DV [digital video] movie. He asked if I had any ideas, so I wrote Deadgirl thinking that it would be really interesting if Lloyd made the kind of movie that no one would expect of him. He read it and seemed to like it, but ultimately it just wasn’t the kind of movie that he wanted to do. It all worked out for the better, in my opinion…but it took nearly a decade to happen the way it did! 

DeadGirl2Hey, it happened the way it was supposed to, man. Tell me, how was your experience with the filming? Are you happy with the filmmakers’ interpretation of your script?

It was great. We shot it here in L.A. My wife was the costume designer. I was the AD [assistant director]. It was everything that’s great about low-budget filmmaking, but with a more—dare I say “artistic?”—ambition. I worked on the script with the directors for a few months and was there every day on-set. It was very hands-on for me, particularly so considering I’m the writer. I’m extremely pleased with the outcome. And it’s great to make something that premieres at a prestigious festival like Toronto. I’d work with [co-directors] Gadi [Harel] and Marcel [Sarmiento] again in a second.

So, what’s on the radar for you, Trent? Anything in particular planned?

The writing thing seems to be working best for me right now. Deadgirl has been playing some very prestigious festivals to some amount of acclaim. I landed an agent and manager as a writer, and have a couple of writing projects working—some already in the can and in pre-production, some on the horizon. I’m not going anywhere for the time being!

~Theron Neel