Posts Tagged ‘Paul McCartney’

Happy Birthday to Us—Meet the family

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

Can you believe it? After 12 months and 184 posts, the grand experiment that is Slammed & Damned carries on. We still don’t know exactly what kind of site Slammed & Damned wants to be, but I’m beginning to think that will never change. We’ve accepted the fact that our child will never go to medical school and will continue to do whatever he wants, which is fine. He’s always loved movies and the folks that make them, so maybe he’s on the right path.

One thing I have learned over the past year is that the horror blogging community comprises an insane group of talented people that truly love horror flicks and aren’t afraid to tell you why. I’ve made many friends since Slammed & Damned was born, and truth be told, I’ve come to think of them as relatives of a sort. I mean, what is family? Over the years, the definition has gotten bigger and more flexible, but I like to think that a family is a (sometimes disparate) group of people connected by a shared love—I believe that describes horror bloggers perfectly, don’t you?

So, on this, Slammed & Damned’s birthday, I want to take the opportunity not to discuss what Slammed & Damned has done (you know, things like the extended Rolfe Kanefsky interview, my friendly feud with Paul McCartney, my look at the Soska twins or Devi Snively, TFO’s free-wheeling roundtable interview, my philosophical reflections, mini-biosMcT & A’s recent adventures or even the scads of reviews that have been posted). No, I want to focus on this twisted extended family I’ve come into during the past year.

First, you can’t have a family without a mom and dad. And I think we all can agree that the father of all horror bloggers is the wonderful B-Sol over at The Vault of Horror, one of the most comprehensive horror sites on the inwebternet. A noted bon vivant and horror aficionado, B-Sol has gone out of his way to befriend me and offer advice, and for this I thank him graciously. And my horror mom will always be the divine Sarah Jahier over at Fatally Yours. She was the first person to give a virtual home to my screeds, even when my meager writing skills weren’t. Skills, that is (see, they haven’t improved much).

Every family has a couple of wacky brothers, and my brothers in horror are the lovely Chris Hallock over at All Things Horror and the equally lovely Cortez the Killer at Plant of Terror. Chris pretty much is horror in the Boston area, and Cortez regularly slays Dallas and the world with his keen insight and wit. Gentlemen and scholars both, please check ‘em out immediately if not sooner.

No family is complete without a crazy aunt and an off-the-wall sister, and Heidi Martinuzzi and Stacie Ponder, respectively, fill those roles. As you no doubt already know, Heidi is the proprietor the new site called FanGirlTastic, which is a new-and-improved iteration of her trail-blazing site Pretty/Scary. Crazy Aunt Heidi is controversially polarizing and wretched talented and, for some reason, she always makes time for me—time she absolutely doesn’t have because, like a hyper child, she’s in to everything all the time. Stacie, better known as the blogger Final Girl, has been expanding her palette to include all aspects of filmmaking. She’s been a friend for awhile, and I’m proud to watch her grow as an artist. Oh, and we can’t forget my crazy Uncle Johns, John Kenneth Muir and John Cozzoli at Zombos’ Closet of Horror. They are both exceedingly wise men. Read them.

I have to admit that I’m pretty satisfied with what Slammed & Damned has done so far. We have a small, but steady, group of readers, which is fine. Admittedly, Slammed & Damned isn’t for everyone. We don’t really do horror news or cover the big horror films. We just kind of march to the beat of the muse we’re following (and mix our metaphors). But we’ve had a good time and done some cool stuff, with more to come. Of course, I couldn’t do it at all without the help of Kimberly Amato (my director of technology…well, all things ending in “-ology,” actually), a web guru par excellence as well as a talented performer and filmmaker. She’s planning some kind of techie stuff for Slammed & Damned, but (slammed and) damned if I know what it is. Come back and find out with me!

Better minds than mine will have to decide if it’s a coincidence that BP was able to fix the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico during the same week that Slammed & Damned celebrated a birthday. I’m not at liberty to comment on that. One thing I can confirm is that we’ll be here at least another year. How do I know? Well, I paid the rent, of course. Are you scared yet?

~Theron Neel

Paul McCartney—The horror!

Friday, February 12th, 2010

This is the second entry in my “The horror” series. Okay, granted, this isn’t about horror per se, but it’s something I find horrible and that’s been on my mind for quite a while now, so bear with me while I get it off my chest. We’ll return to horror interviews, reviews and profiles soon enough, I promise.

All right, I know what you’re thinking: What can possibly be horrible about that nice Paul McCartney? After all, he was the cute Beatle. Is it his recent misguided marriage to Heather Mills? Naw, I don’t blame him for wanting companionship in his golden years. Could he have chosen a better bride? Sure. But, hey, that’s his business. Perhaps you think the horror involves his post-Beatles tendency to write and record somewhat trite love songs. No, that’s not it either. I remain an unapologetic supporter of McCartney’s music—yes, even schmaltzy trifles like “Silly Love Songs” or “My Love,” which, in fact, is a deceptively harmonically complex tune that deserves more respect than it gets. McCartney is more craftsman than artist, and even his most light-weight songs are tuneful, well-made pop product—at worst, guilty pleasures to tap your foot to and hum along with as you drive.

No, the horror to which I refer concerns McCartney’s pig-headed refusal to allow the film Let it Be to be re-released. For those too young to know (or care), Let it Be was a documentary, filmed in 1969, that followed the Beatles into the studio while they rehearsed and recorded the Let it Be album. This film is both a historical document and a fine flick full of amazing music that deserves to be available. I mean, the Beatles were arguably the best band in rock history and inarguably the most influential. A film that shows them actually creating and shaping music and then playing it live is invaluable. It’s both exciting and fascinating to watch this set of songs take shape and evolve, going though different arrangements before the final versions are recorded. It’s just extraordinary to see the greatest band in history be a real band.

And that is exactly why McCartney doesn’t want it released. Let it Be shows the Beatles acting like real people and real members of a real band. Yes, some of the music is a bit raw and rough in places. But that’s fantastic. To see a band known for its polished studio creations playing and sounding like a regular band is a precious thing. Those incredible songs didn’t just happen. Even the Beatles had to jam and practice to arrive at greatness. But I don’t think that’s the issue. If I’m not mistaken, McCartney’s major problem with the film most likely involves one scene in particular.

A little backstory: The Beatles began recording Let it Be in January 1969, just a few months after they finished recording The Beatles (aka the White Album). Those had been very tense sessions, with various members “exploring their options,” as we say in the corporate world. Ringo Starr actually did leave, only to return a couple of weeks later. Being “the Beatles” was taking its toll on the guys. John Lennon had considered quitting the band as early as 1965, but he kept going because, hey, being a Beatle was a good gig. How do you walk away from the biggest band in the world? But being a Beatle was harder than you’d think. They were the first band to experience the level of fame they had. By 1969, after years of being under the microscope and labeled one thing, all the band members were on edge and ready to bolt.

Paul had taken charge of the Let it Be sessions due to a lack of interest on the part of the rest of the group. Now, a rehearsal should be a closed session, but the very premise of Let it Be demanded a film crew be on hand at all times, sticking cameras in the faces of vulnerable, camera-shy musicians. To make things worse, it was decided the sessions should take place at a film studio rather than the Beatles’ usual rehearsal space. All these issues virtually assured an uptight atmosphere.

The one scene I think McCartney has an issue with involves George Harrison, who has since passed on. He and George are discussing George’s playing on a song that Paul wrote. Paul keeps giving George direction on what he wants to hear on the tune, but he isn’t very specific. He talks in generalities and, knowing he’s pissing off George, keeps going in circles trying to be polite and diplomatic. George eventually lays it on the line. He angrily tells Paul that he’ll play whatever Paul wants, but Paul needs to tell him exactly what that is. Paul basically comes off as a micro-managing asshole. But that’s what it’s like to be in a band! (Note to Paul: This is not a big deal, man. This is human nature at work. I know George is dead now, but it’s okay. No one will hate you for being human.) I’ve seen this same fight countless times. As a musician, seeing the Beatles have the same arguments as I’ve had was a heartening experience.

Sources have stated: “The Beatles are still a massive global brand and it’s felt it won’t be helped if the public sees the darker side of the story. People like to imagine the Beatles were a happy ship but the reality towards the end was very different as this film shows. ” While I understand where they’re coming from, I respectfully disagree. It would be nice to live in The Land of Make-Believe and think of the Beatles only as those wacky lads from Liverpool with the mop-top haircuts. But that wouldn’t be the truth. No matter how other-worldly their music was, the Beatles were human musicians in a real-world band, experiencing super-human pressures. As someone who has been in bands most of his life, I can attest that being in a not-famous band is hard. It’s like a marriage, but with several people. And we all know how tough a two-person marriage can be. Multiply that by four. It’s a difficult situation at best. Add to that all the pressures of superstardom? Trust me, it’s astounding they’re just snippy with each other.

If nothing else, Let it Be deserves to be seen for the glorious rooftop mini-concert that closes the film. As a climax for the flick, the guys decided to set up on the freezing roof of the Apple Records building, in the heart of London’s financial district, and play a set of the songs recorded during the sessions. It’s such a kick to see the reactions of people on the street when they realize the Beatles are playing above them. Crowds start to clamor and eventually the police have to go up and shut the band down, all of which is caught on film. This is the first live performance they’d given since 1966, and it was also their last—and, as such, it deserves to be available for the world to see.

So, come on, Paul. Let Let it Be be. You don’t owe us anything, but we need your help. We know being a Beatle was all too much, but it’s getting better. In your life, you’ve given us every little thing. And we know you’re so tired of it all, but I’ve got a feeling: From me to you, I want to tell you all you’ve got to do is don’t let us down.

~Theron Neel

Taste the Blood of Dracula

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Taste the Blood of DraculaIn honor of the recently knighted Christopher Lee, I declare it Hammer time at Slammed & Damned. In my opinion, you can’t touch Sir Christopher’s portrayal of Count Dracula in the films produced by Hammer studios. So today, we’re going to look at what is usually thought of as the last of Lee’s truly great Dracula movies, Taste the Blood of Dracula (filmed in 1969, but released in 1970), though calling this flick “truly great” might be overstating it a bit. Lee played Dracula in seven Hammer films, and Dracula Has Risen From the Grave (1968) is the only one I would call truly great. Horror of Dracula (1958), Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966) and Taste the Blood of Dracula are all solid films, but the others—Scars of Dracula (1970), Dracula AD 1972 (1972) and The Satanic Rites of Dracula (1973)—are definitely lesser films, each more embarrassing than the one before.

Taste the Blood of Dracula is not at all a bad film. Consumer Alert: If you read the Netflix description of this flick (Count Dracula is back in action when three swingers turn to black magic to boost their sex-drive slump), you will definitely get the wrong impression. That makes this sound like a soft-core porn movie, and nothing could be further from the truth. The setting is Victorian England, and the “three swingers” in question are actually three middle-aged men who are pillars of their community. But on the last Sunday of each month, they gather in a brothel on the wrong side of town to enjoy whatever salacious delights are available—the more bizarre, the better. This being 1869 by way of 1969, “bizarre” equals topless women and a belly dancer wrapped in a boa constrictor. Now, for a Hammer film, this is racy stuff (we actually see a bare breast or two), but these gentlemen are growing bored with it. Enter the arrogant Lord Courtley.

You'll be sorry!Young Lord Courtley promises the men delights previously unimagined, if only they trust him and pony up 1,000 guineas ($5,250). For this then-kingly sum, they will purchase Dracula’s cape, signet clasp and a vial of his powdered blood. With that, they will supposedly be able to resurrect the Master by performing a satanic rite and, apparently, enjoy pleasures not of this world. Granted, it’s all rather vague but they go along with it, fools that they are. And as any sane person might expect, these fools are soon in fear for their lives as an annoyed Dracula hunts them down to take vengeance for Lord Courtley, who died in the ceremony. Here’s the twist: Dracula uses the men’s teen children to exact his revenge.

I suppose this is Hammer trying to impose a socially relevant metaphor into its flagging Dracula series. I don’t know if it boosted the movie’s commercial potential upon release, but in 2009 it’s fun to watch these hypocrites get their comeuppance from the younger generation. Sure, these guys can hang out in bordellos, but they won’t allow their kids to go to a party? Well, Count Dracula has something to say about that. Hungry freaks, daddy, indeed!

Gotta love itTaste the Blood of Dracula, directed by Peter Sasdy, picks up right where Dracula Has Risen From the Grave (directed by Freddie Francis) ends, and it’s an interesting contrast. Sasdy started directing in the late ‘50s and Taste the Blood of Dracula looks like a film directed by a journeyman trying to adapt to a new era. It moves slowly, but has a few of the “freak-out” camera moves popular at the time. Freddie Francis got his start as a camera assistant in the ‘30s and moved up to cinematographer, working on classic films such as The Innocents before he began directing, and Dracula Has Risen From the Grave is a better film for his extensive experience.

Sir Christopher Lee has had an amazing life and career. Sure, there have been lean times, but how many actors have been able to reinvent themselves and establish a new persona for several new generations? Think about it for a second. Lee has played Count Dracula, Frankenstein’s monster, Fu Manchu and the Mummy. You youngsters out there might know him as Count Dooku (he battled Yoda, fer chrissakes) or Saruman. He was in the original version of The Wicker Man and was a Bond villain in The Man With the Golden Gun—he’s also Ian Fleming’s step-cousin. Directors he’s worked with include Laurence Olivier, Peter Jackson, Tim Burton and Steven Spielberg. He actually knew J.R.R. Tolkein, and he is on the cover of Paul McCartney’s Band on the Run album. He’s in the Guinness Book of World Records as “tallest leading actor.” He has even hosted Saturday Night Live. And, as if that’s not enough, he’s now been knighted by the Queen of England—talk about an overachiever.

The one true DraculaBut even if he becomes king, Sir Christopher Lee will always be Count Dracula to me. His Dracula wasn’t the suave bloodsucker that Bela Lugosi gave us. Lee’s Dracula was a “love ‘em and leave ‘em” fanged feral animal. He might not have been politically correct, but he knew what he wanted and he got it. Actually, his Dracula really did get it. I believe he died at the end of each of his films but, like Jason Vorhees today, he always managed to come back. Now that I think of it, that’s not a bad description of Christopher Lee himself.

~Theron Neel