Posts Tagged ‘Theron Neel’

Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, It’s Magic

Monday, February 8th, 2010

As proof of the power of voodoo, I offer the Super Bowl win of the New Orleans Saints. A cheap shot? Maybe, but you have to understand that the Saints have a certain reputation down here in the Gulf Coast. Nice guys to be sure, but winners? Rarely. Kind of like the Houston Astros…well, a lot like the Houston Astros. Don’t get me wrong—I’m thrilled they won. New Orleans is one of the coolest cities in the world. It’s had a very hard time the last few years, and this win will go a long way toward getting the city completely back on its feet.

So, here’s to you, New Orleans Saints! Enjoy it while it lasts. You earned it. But now I feel sorry for that nice Peyton Manning. I wonder how his dad, beloved former Saints quarterback Archie Manning, is handling this whole mess. I foresee awkward family meals over the next few months.

~Theron Neel

Stephanie Hyden—Ready for anything

Friday, February 5th, 2010

We’re back with another piece in our series on Trash Film Orgy’s upcoming flick, Planet of the Vampire Women. Today, the focus is on a glamorous young actress and comedian named Stephanie Hyden. Stephanie has been involved with TFO, on both stage and screen, over the last few years, but she’s had showbiz dreams since childhood. She has been a bit of chameleon in her work with TFO, so I was eager to find out about the real Stephanie. Recently, I got the chance to talk with this multitalented performer about life, love and shooting at space bats.

Hi Stephanie, thanks for taking the time for this quick chat. Can we get a little background info about you. Where are you from?

I was born and raised in Sacramento, but I moved a lot.

And have you always been a performer?

I started writing plays and puppet shows when I was 7; it was an easy way to make friends. I would cast the neighborhood kids and we would put on a show for our parents. My mom would make popcorn and she would make it a really fun event. I have her to thank for being a performer.

How did you get involved with those nutballs at Trash Film Orgy?

I started going to the annual Trash Film Orgy Film festival in 2004 and loved the stage shows and getting to heckle some of my favorite films on the big screen. The next year, I was in their first film, El Tigre Diablo and the Curse of the Golden Skull, and asked to be one of the stage performers. I’ve been a part of the TFO ever since.

Speaking of Trash Film Orgy, I hear you’re starring in their latest flick, Planet of the Vampire Women. Can you give me a little dirt on the production? How is it going so far?

I look forward to every day we film, everyone gets along really well and we have a lot of laughs. It’s going great! Last week I got to shoot at space bats.

Cool! Gotta love that. What can you tell me about your character?

I play Astrid Covair, a sexy, bubbly pleasure clone who’s tired of her job. I love playing her because she has a halo-suit that allows her to change her appearance on a whim.

Wow—by my reckoning you’ve portrayed a zombie cheerleader, an intrepid reporter and, now, a sexy pleasure clone? TFO really allows you to play a range of weirdness, eh?

Not to mention all the humorous characters I’ve had the pleasure to play onstage. I really have Darin Wood [co-founder of Trash Film Orgy] to thank for having an endlessly fun imagination.

I hear you’re involved in the world of improv comedy, disproving the cliché that beautiful women aren’t funny. Tell us a little about the very funny ICUP.

I started ICUP Comedy Troupe with my fellow Planet of the Vampire Women co-stars Jawara Duncan and Josh Dietz two years ago. We perform an hour-long original show every month at the Capitol City Hotel and several improv shows in Sacramento. We combine improvisational games and with our sketches, so it’s like Saturday Night Live mixed with Whose Line is it Anyway?

Sounds like fun! Tell me, what do you enjoy more: TFO’s stage productions or acting in front of a camera? It seems like the stage productions would allow you to flex a different set of muscles, more like improv.

It’s hard to choose between the two because I love them both, but with TFO I lean more towards film because I get to sit down, relax and enjoy the experience. When I’m in front of an audience, I have a feeling of complete awareness and I’m ready for anything, but with film I’m calmer and think my characters are more authentic. It’s definitely a different set of muscles and a different mindset.

It’s good to be versatile. So, what’s next for you, Stephanie?

I’m going to continue to study improv and audition for more films.

Good plan. All work and no play makes Stephanie incredibly successful…

~Theron Neel

Portraits in Horror—Maria Ouspenskaya

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

In honor of Women in Horror Recognition Month, allow me to present the first in a series of pieces honoring, well, women in horror.

I want to kick off by focusing on an actress that meant a lot to me as a kid—a woman who, sadly, doesn’t get much attention these days: Madame Maria Ouspenskaya. Though she’ll always be best known as Maleva, the old Gypsy fortuneteller in the great 1941 Universal horror film The Wolf Man, Ouspenskaya was an amazingly versatile actress who led a fascinating life and, though it’s generally not acknowledged, played a major role in the development of acting in America.

Maria Ouspenskaya (Russian: Мария Успенская) was born on July 29, 1876 (sometimes reported as 1887), in Tula, Russia. She first trained as an opera singer and studied voice at the Warsaw Conservatory before fortuitously switching to Adasheff’s School of Drama in Moscow for dramatic training. After graduation, she paid her dues by touring the hinterlands of Russia as part of a theater troupe. During 1917, in the midst of the Russian Revolution, Ouspenskaya joined the Moscow Art Theatre, where she trained and taught under the legendary Konstantin Stanislavski, founder of the famous “Stanislavski Method.” It was during this period that she began her film career, appearing in several Russian silent movies.

In what can only be described as a lucky break for the world and acting as a whole, in 1923 the Moscow Art Theatre toured Europe and the United States. But when the troupe returned to Russia, Ouspenskaya stayed in New York and started teaching the Method at the American Laboratory Theatre. Her students included Stella Adler and Lee Strasberg, both of whom went on to great acclaim, teaching the Method to actors such as James Dean, Montgomery Clift and Marlon Brando. I shudder to think what would’ve happened if Ouspenskaya hadn’t brought Stanislavski’s method to America. As if she wasn’t busy enough, Ouspenskaya also forged a career on Broadway before opening her own acting school, the Maria Ouspenskaya School of Dramatic Arts.

While on Broadway, in 1936, Ouspenskaya appeared in the stage adaptation of Dodsworth, a novel by Sinclair Lewis published in 1929. When Hollywood decided to make a film version, she was chosen to reprise her role onscreen. And for this, she was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress—quite an achievement for her first American film. Over the course of her career, Ouspenskaya appeared in 19 more films and garnered another Oscar nomination.

Though Ouspenskaya was considered a difficult actress to work with, she was much in demand and highly respected for the range of her talent. As evidence of this, she was tapped to portray several nationalities and was skilled enough to play everything from a sweet old lady to a tyrannical ballet teacher. But in 1941, she took the role that forever made her the answer to the trivia question “Who played the Gypsy woman in The Wolf Man?”

As Maleva, Ouspenskaya’s main purpose is to act mysterious and deliver ominous expository dialogue to let the audience—and Lon Chaney Jr.’s Lawrence Talbot—know what’s going to happen. This she does wonderfully, but she does oh so much more. As the mother of the doomed Bela (played by Bela Lugosi), she’s oddly touching as a loving parent who has somehow accepted the fact that her son is damned. Ouspenskaya treated the character of Maleva as seriously as any other she’d played. From her performance, you’d never know Ouspenskaya was acting in a monster movie. As a child, next to the incredible makeup of Jack P. Pierce, it was Ouspenskaya that I loved most about this flick. Her line delivery is pitch perfect. In my mind, I can still hear her saying: “Whoever is bitten by a werewolf and lives becomes a werewolf himself.” Or, “Go now, and heaven help you!” Embarrassing admission time: I used to run around, a towel draped over my shoulders, imitating her delivery of those classic lines, butchering her accent in Make-Believe Land.

Madame Ouspenskaya played Maleva once more in 1943’s underrated Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, in which Bela Lugosi also appeared, this time playing Frankenstein’s monster. After this, she went on to play an Amazon queen in Tarzan and the Amazons and even appeared in a Western called Wyoming. Ouspenskaya died on December 3, 1949, from a stroke, a few days after she suffered massive burns as a result of falling asleep while smoking. While Madame Ouspenskaya will always be remembered as a simple Gypsy woman, everyone should know that she was, first and foremost, an artist.

~Theron Neel

Time for Another Blood Bath

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Pretty Scary Blood Bath Film FestivalI’m happy to announce there’s going to be another blood bath in Texas. First, there was that messy chainsaw massacre back in the ’70s, which people are still talking about. Then last year, there was the Texas Blood Bath Festival. Now, in honor of the Women in Horror Recognition Month, DOA Blood Bath Entertainment and Damnation Books are presenting the Pretty Scary Blood Bath Film Festival from 11 am to 6 pm on Saturday, February 27, 2010, at the Studio Movie Grill in Addison, Texas, right outside of Dallas. The fest, sponsored in part by Heidi Martinuzzi of Pretty-Scary.net, will showcase a selection of indie horror films created by women.

Both short and feature-length flicks will be presented, including The Mis-Adventures of McT & A by Kimberly Amato, Amy Lyndon and Michelle Tomlinson, Death in Charge by Devi Snively, Family Demons by Ursula Dabrowsky, and Dead Hooker in a Trunk by Jen and Sylvia Soska. Also featured will be the world premiere of The Retelling by Emily Hagins.

Eve Blaack, owner and editor of Hacker’s Source magazine, will serve as Mistress of Ceremonies. I have it on good authority that both Ms. Martinuzzi and Ms. Tomlinson will be in attendance as well. If you’re cool, you’ll be there too. I know I will. Tickets are $15 and are available HERE. If you need a place to stay, try the Hyatt in Addison.

I don’t know what it is about the Lone Star state that attracts all this blood, but this event definitely makes me Texas Proud. And that whole Leatherface thing? That’s pretty cool too.

~Theron Neel

Why Am I in a Box?

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Why Am I In a Box?One of the most mistaken assumptions is that artists have it easy. Sure, it sounds awesome. You get to sit around in your pajamas all day, chasing your muse and watching or reading whatever catches your attention, all in the name of “research.” But then you have to actually do the work. You have to create. You have to deliver the goods. You have to make something out of nothing. And therein lies the rub. Take it from me—inspiration isn’t always enough. Sometimes, you need a little something extra to motivate you. Writer/director/actress Rachel Grubb obviously knows this. Her new film, Why Am I in a Box?, is a look at artists who need, shall we say, extreme motivation. And they get it. Boy, do they get it.

Ellen Farnsby (Rachel Grubb) is a writer. Well, she wants to be a writer. Her boyfriend, Ted (Mike Rylander), is a writer too. Well, he wants to be a writer too. Jeremy (Derek Dirlam), who has a crush on Ellen, is a filmmaker. Well, he wants to be a filmmaker. All that’s keeping these artists from creating a masterpiece is themselves. That’s where Paige (Brooke Lemke) comes in. Paige wants to be a writer, but she knows her limits. Rather than torture herself with delusions of grandeur, she’d much rather torture someone else. So, one day she kidnaps Ellen and locks her away in a room, demanding Ellen write a novel. Think of Paige as the ultimate patron. She’s willing to provide Ellen with everything she needs to create—especially inspiration. See, if Paige doesn’t like what Ellen writes, Ellen will die. And as proof of her commitment, Paige presents the severed finger of a former protégé. How’s that for inspiration? It’s certainly enough for Ellen, who begins writing for her life, while the men in her life begin trying to save her life…that is, when they’re not trying to create their own works of art—because, really, what’s more important: life or art?

A prisoner of her artGrubb has given us a movie that, severed limbs aside, bears more relation to the mumblecore films of Andrew Bujalski than to standard-issue fright flicks—call it “mumblehorror” if you will. This quirky black comedy rambles along at its own pace, finding its rhythm as it goes. But that’s all part of its charm. Another part of its charm is the performances of its cast. While some of the players are a bit uneven, all of the principals are very good. For me, the standout is Derek Dirlam. As Jeremy, he demonstrates the charisma and chops necessary to easily carry a big-budget, mainstream project. Speaking of budget, Grubb has delivered a flick that, quality-wise, is head and shoulders above other low-budget indie horror films. Why Am I in a Box? looks and, more surprisingly, sounds wonderful. That’s quite an achievement for a first-time director working with limited funds.

Ms. Grubb began her career with plans to become a novelist. Along the way, she got sidetracked. With Why Am I in a Box?, she’s been able to cleverly exorcise those authorial demons. Hopefully, she has a little left over in her toolbox for her next flick. Maybe something about a slacker actress that gets some much-needed motivation from an overzealous director? Ooh, that’s good. I think I’ll write my own screenplay—right after I finish watching this Project Runway marathon.

~Theron Neel

Baba Yaga (aka Kiss Me Kill Me)

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Baba YagaWell, we made it. It’s the last stop on Slammed & Damned’s whirlwind European tour. We’ve seen four Euro horror films in four days. And while we haven’t seen all that much of Europe, we have seen four very different styles of Euro horror. First, it was Devil’s Nightmare, a slightly sleazy Belgian/Italian film. Then we saw Pieces, a wonderfully awful Spanish slasher flick. Next, it was back to Italy for Mario Bava’s atmospheric marvel Kill, Baby…Kill! And now we arrive at our final selection, a 1973 Italian/French production called Baba Yaga (aka Kiss Me Kill Me).

As you’ll remember, originally I was going to review Kiss Me Kill Me, before I realized it was the same flick as Baba Yaga. Because my copy of Kiss Me Kill Me is an inferior-quality disc, I decided to treat myself and review my nice, remastered DVD of Baba Yaga instead. I hope that’s okay with everyone. Although Kiss Me Kill Me and Baba Yaga are essentially the same film, there might be minor differences between them. I apologize if you were looking forward to a review of Kiss Me Kill Me specifically.

Baba Yaga in printThe film Baba Yaga is based on a graphic novel of the same name by Italian comics artist Guido Crepax, who came to prominence in the 1960s and ‘70s and was known for his fluid illustrations and erotic, hallucinatory storytelling. Though he’s not a household name, he has been covertly influential over the years. If you’ve seen Frank Miller’s Sin City books, you’ve seen Crepax.

Baba Yaga is the story of Valentina Rosselli (Isabelle De Funès), a popular photographer known for her edgy, politically influenced glamour shots. One day, Valentina catches the eye of Baba Yaga (Carroll Baker), a beautiful older woman who just might be a witch. With the help of her friend Arno (George Eastman), Valentina does her best to resist Baba Yaga’s efforts at seduction and domination. And while this plot unfolds, we get a good look at ‘70s fashion in all its tacky glory. The proceedings are filled with deliciously decadent glam-rock clothes and furnishings, as well as a large dose of the nudity and fetishism favored by Crepax.

Baba Yaga onscreenDirector Corrado Farina set out to interpret Crepax’s work into the medium of film and he did a good job—maybe too good of a job. What works on the comic page doesn’t necessarily work on the screen. Crepax’s stories and images are surreal dreamscapes that are highly impressionistic and often lack a strong plot line. In his work, it’s not the tale that’s important; what matters is how it’s told. Farina employed the same philosophy in making Baba Yaga, but the demands of commercial film (and his producers) required a somewhat straightforward narrative be imposed. So, Farina wrapped his basic tale in bizarre imagery and visual non sequiturs that are faithful to Crepax but don’t have much relation to traditional film grammar and syntax. The end result is a bit of a mess. But it’s a Euro-fabulous mess that can be a lot of fun if you approach it on its own terms. Also, don’t expect much horror in this horror movie. It’s not scary, just stylish. But that’s enough for me. I choose to view it as a time capsule—one that includes a groovy score as well as a leather-clad killer sex doll. (See what I did? If you were on the fence, I know you want to see it now.) Check out the NSFW trailer below for a taste of Baba Yaga’s sado-delights.

Wow, is that it? I can hardly believe we’re done with Euro Horror Week and our look at the Blood Bath DVD four-pack. It’s been a hectic, yet fun-filled few days. Travel should be educational, and I have to say that I did learn something from our trek. While I’ve always thought of Euro horror as a fairly limited genre, I think we’ve seen that it’s not. It contains, to borrow a phrase from ska-punk band Sublime, “everything under the sun.” And if you ask me, to borrow a phrase from ‘80s British band Fine Young Cannibals, that’s a “good thing.” One more thing, I hope my use of all these song titles to close my reviews this week didn’t, to borrow a phrase from Canadian band The Odds, “make you mad.” (Personally, it’s kinda getting on my nerves.)

~Theron Neel

Kill, Baby…Kill!

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Kill, Baby...Kill!Here we are on day three of Slammed & Damned’s Euro Horror Week, during which we’re taking a look at the flicks in a DVD four-pack called Blood Bath. If you remember, we began in Italy 1971 and then shot over to Spain 1982. Now we’re back in Italy again. Even though we seem to be spending a lot of time in la bella Italia, you have to admit this tour is giving us a nice look at a pretty wide range of Euro horror. Today, we’re going to visit the brilliant Mario Bava’s 1966 film Kill, Baby…Kill! (aka Operazione paura), which is about as far from Pieces as you can get.

We open in Germany 1907. A string of mysterious deaths has occurred in a small village. Though it’s a new era, the villagers are still mired in the lore and superstition of centuries past. While the deaths all seem to be accidents, it is commonly believed that the real cause is a local curse. Hoping to get to the bottom of these tragedies, Inspector Kruger has summoned a coroner, Dr. Paul Eswai (Giacomo Rossi-Stuart), to examine the corpse of the most recent victim. Aiding him will be the beautiful Monica (Erika Blanc), who has recently returned to the village from school. Together, they discover a silver coin embedded in the heart of the dead girl and are soon drawn into a mystery with ramifications neither are prepared to believe possible. It seems the spirit of young Melissa Graps, who died 20 years earlier, is back to take vengeance on the people of her village. But can this be true? What role does Ruth, the local sorceress, play? And what of the mysterious Baroness Graps, who lives alone in her crumbling villa? Is she mad, evil…or both?

Evil is a childKill, Baby…Kill! is a wonderful film and an excellent example of what’s great about Mario Bava as a filmmaker. It’s interesting to step back and view this film in context of the times in which it was made. In the mid-sixties, Britain’s Hammer Studios was making solid, Gothic horror flicks, while in America, Roger Corman was doing the same through American International Pictures. Over in Italy, Bava was making similar films, but he brought a level artistic skill that far surpassed that of his peers. Kill, Baby…Kill! is full of what we love about Bava: artful compositions, expert utilization of shadow and light, an active camera, surprising use of color. Watching this movie today, it’s easy to see the line connecting Bava and Dario Argento, who seems to have picked up where Bava left off—maybe more so than Bava’s son, Lamberto, who acts here as his father’s assistant director.

If you want an understated piece of atmospheric horror filmmaking with subtle hallucinogenic visual touches, seek out Kill, Baby…Kill! It might not be as well known as Black Sunday or Black Sabbath, but it’s definitely as good a film—in fact, in some ways it might even be better.

All right, people, we’re almost done with our whirlwind tour of Europe, and I must admit I’m beginning to flag a bit. One more flick to go. Check in tomorrow to see if I can do it, to borrow a phrase from Daft Punk, “one more time.”

~Theron Neel

Pieces

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

PiecesWelcome to the second stop on Slammed & Damned’s European tour. Yesterday, Euro Horror Week began in Italy, with an exciting visit to Devil’s Nightmare. Today, we hop over to Spain for a 1982 slasher-fest called Pieces (aka Mil gritos tiene la noche), a somewhat notorious film in certain circles. No less an authority than director Eli Roth has called this flick “a masterpiece of early ‘80s sleaze.” And he’s right. But that’s not all it is.

If I had to choose one word to describe Pieces, it would be “gratuitous.” Everything about this movie is gratuitous. The violence? Gratuitous. The nudity? Gratuitous. The aerobic dancewear? Gratuitous. I mean, it’s just all so over the top and so terrible. And that’s exactly why it’s so wonderful.

Pieces was written by the infamous trash-meister Joe D’Amato, but it doesn’t appear to have been written at all. The story is all over the place here. This is one of those films where you’re constantly asking, “Didn’t he just…?” or “Why did they…?” At times, it seems director Juan Piquer Simón cut the flick up into pieces and assembled it while blindfolded and then dubbed in explanatory dialogue to fix any narrative problems. And somehow, it all works.

We open in Boston 1942. A boy, about 10 years old, is putting together a nudie puzzle when his mom walks in and freaks out. And I mean Freaks. Out. She starts screaming angrily and trashing the room, and then she demands that he go fetch her a plastic bag to clean up with. He goes, but he doesn’t bring back a plastic bag (which weren’t even invented until 1950). He returns with an axe, and then he freaks out. And I mean FREAKS. OUT. He whacks her with the axe and then sits down to gleefully dismember her with a saw. Unlike his mom, he hasn’t lost his head—when the police show up, he hides in a closet and plays innocent.

Chills!Cut (ahem) to 40 years later. There’s a maniac running loose on a Boston university campus, cutting up coeds with a chainsaw and taking pieces of the bodies. We know the killer is the little boy because we see him reassembling the now bloody puzzle from the opening scene. But who is he? Is he a student? Is he the groundskeeper? Is he a professor or maybe the dean? Soon, the police are called in. Apparently, the Boston police department only has two detectives, and they might well be the most incompetent detectives in movie history. But they mean well and everyone respects them. Eventually, the case is solved, but not before the murderer has bloodily chopped up several coeds and collected enough body parts to assemble a human nudie puzzle. The end?

Thrills!I love this movie so much, but where to begin? Let’s break it down. First, the score of this flick is fantastic. It’s like a character all its own. One minute, it’s moody Goblin-like electro sound effects; the next minute, it’s cheesy ‘70s porn music. But it’s always perfect. Awesome! Next, this killer isn’t your usual maniac. He seems to also be the invisible man. This guy strolls around campus in broad daylight wearing a trench coat, a suspicious black fedora pulled low, clumsily hiding his chainsaw behind his back—and no one notices. Awesome! Next, because the police force is so understaffed, the lead detective (‘70s hunk Christopher George) calls in an amateur to work undercover. But not just any amateur. He calls in former world-famous tennis pro Mary Riggs (‘70s fox Linda Day George), who happens to have retired to a desk job in the police station. Awesome!

Bastard!!!Speaking of Linda Day George, she has maybe the best scene in the movie. After finding the bloody corpse of a young girl, she’s so upset that she stands waving her clenched fists and looking at the sky, screaming “Bastard! Bastard! (beat) BASTARD!!!” It’s so deliciously awful, I had to stop and watch it twice. Awesome! Add to that the aforementioned aerobic dancewear that seems to appear every few minutes, as well as a kung fu attack that comes out of nowhere for no reason other than to have a kung fu attack in the movie, and you just have one of the best worst flicks ever committed to film. But it’s not all bad. If Pieces gets anything right, it’s the kills. There are several bloody, stylish murders here. So, if you’re watching and scratching your head at some incongruous plot point, just wait a few minutes. You’ll be rewarded with a slo-mo stabbing on a water bed or something cool like that.

Oops, I forgot to mention the ending, which totally violates the rules of storytelling. The reveal of the killer is utterly underplayed. It’s mentioned almost as an afterthought. Of course, by then we’ve figured it out. It’s pretty clear who the murderer is within the first 20 minutes. Still, they could’ve tried to make it the big deal it’s supposed to be. Also, there’s a point at which the flick really should’ve ended—a pretty good jump scare. It was the perfect place to stop…but they kept on going…and tacked on another jump scare that’s just plain confusing and totally cuts the tension of the first one, sending the film off in a completely different direction right before it stops. But somehow, and I’m not sure how, it’s the perfect ending for this film.

More chills!So, with Pieces, the filmmakers have given us one of the worst films I’ve ever seen, and in so doing, one of the best films I’ve ever seen. I’m still not sure how they did it, but I really don’t care. I’m just glad it exists.

All right, there you have the second entry in Euro Horror Week. There are two more films to watch and review over the next three days and, so far, I’m doing pretty well. I think I can make it, coach. Oh, one thing before I close. Yesterday, I jokingly asked you to “place your bets” on my ability to complete the challenge I’ve set for myself. I want to stress that this is an exhibition, not a competition. So, please, no wagering. Personally, I remain cautiously optimistic. Stop by tomorrow as we resume our tour and I, to borrow a phrase from The Wiz, “ease on down the road.”

~Theron Neel

Devil’s Nightmare

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Devil's NightmareWe kick off Euro Horror Week with a 1971 Belgian/Italian flick for which details are fuzzy and information is hard to come by, even though it seems to be somewhat popular. As so often happens with low-budget foreign horror movies from the 1970s, this movie has a plethora of titles. On the DVD box, it’s called Devil’s Nightmare, though I find it listed other places as The Devil’s Nightmare (a small difference to be sure, but just the kind to make me crazy). The title in the credits of the movie is La Terrificante Notte Del Demonio, but on IMDb it comes up as La plus longue nuit du diable. In all, I’ve found a whopping 14 different titles for this flick. So, call it what you like. You know what they say: A rose by any other name—but is Devil’s Nightmare a rose? I suppose it might be, if you consider the fact that it has a few thorns.

We open in sepia-toned Berlin 1945. One particular Nazi, Baron von Rhoneberg (a nice Teutonic name), has stepped away from the war to be at the birth of his child. Sadly, his wife dies in childbirth (much like the Nazi agenda, not sadly), but he’s presented with an adorable baby girl, who he immediately stabs with his bayonet. This is probably the most disturbing scene in the whole flick, and the fact that it occurs five minutes in is one of the thorns I alluded to. Remember, this is foreign horror from 30 years ago. It moves very slowly, even for me—a guy raised during the ‘70s. I love flicks like this, but this was the longest 95 minutes I’ve spent watching a movie in quite a while. But I digress.

Cut to Berlin 1971. Baron von Rhoneberg has locked himself away in his family castle. A nosy reporter has tracked him down and is hounding him for an interview. You’d think she wants to know how a high-ranking Nazi officer escaped prosecution, but you’d be wrong. She’s after the hard-hitting story of the von Rhoneberg family curse. It seems that a pact has been made with Satan. It seems each generation’s first-born girl will become a succubus (which explains why the Baron killed his daughter). And it seems to be common knowledge, so I don’t know why the reporter had so much trouble getting the story. Even all the villagers know. But villagers always seem to know everything, don’t they? When the reporter is found dead (of course), the villagers gather round the body and agree that it must’ve been the succubus. Ah, the age before the internet. Can you imagine if this happened today? It’d be all over The Drudge Report in seconds. But I digress.

Succubus at workMeanwhile, a tour bus full of seven sightseers (the usual varied group of clichéd characters from European Central Casting) is tooling around the German forest, seeing the sites (which seem to be, umm, trees). The tour bus hits a roadblock, but the driver is advised by an über-creepy farmer to head to—say it with me—the Baron’s castle, which he does (of course). After they arrive, it soon becomes über-clear that the seven people on the bus represent the seven deadly sins, though some of them are sketched more broadly than others. It was über-easy to identify lust, gluttony, greed and pride. But all the others just seemed to be über-whiny, which isn’t a deadly sin though it probably should be. But I über-digress.

Later that night, the mysterious Lita shows up, a beautiful flame-haired Euro-babe. While she is initially turned away by the housekeeper, she eventually gains entry. And this is when things start to go über-bad. (I swear that’s my last “über” gag.) To make a slow story fast, Lita is a succubus and she begins to knock off people in ways related to the seven deadly sins. I say “begins” because the whole theme peters out after the first couple of kills. Eventually, a fairly effective twist ending is tacked on to finish things up. The end.

Devil’s Nightmare starts strong, but slows as it goes. It has plenty of what makes ‘70s Euro horror great: atmosphere and hot chicks in skimpy clothes. Though the production values in this flick are low, the costumes and makeup are seventies-tastic. Because the movie has been dubbed in to English, the performances are hard to judge. And, boy, has this flick been dubbed—at times, I felt as if I was watching Godzilla by way of an episode of Speed Racer. There isn’t much gore at all, but when there is, the filmmakers use that classic bright-red fake blood that looks like paint (which I love, but your mileage may vary). Another Euro-horror trope Devil’s Nightmare has is the almost-mandatory lesbian sex scene. So, you can relax. It’s here, though admittedly somewhat modest. It’s as if director Jean Brismée knows he has to include one, but doesn’t want it to be gratuitous, which is funny if you think about it.

Psst, this is SatanThe only actors I’ll mention by name are Erika Blanc, who plays the succubus, and Daniel Emilfork, who plays Satan. Blanc is an Italian actress known for her work in horror flicks of the period. She’s quite good as Lita, prowling around in revealing clothes and tempting people to their doom. Her makeup in Devil’s Nightmare is an interesting choice. She’s gorgeous as she tempts people, but when they die she looks like, well, a green current-day Faye Dunaway. Emilfork is one of those actors you know you’ve seen somewhere. I finally realized I knew him from the cool French film The City of Lost Children. Here, all he has to do is sit around looking mysterious, and he nails it.

So there you go. The first entry in Euro Horror Week has been watched and reviewed, people. Can I keep up this grueling pace? Place your bets. Sure, four movies over five days sounds easy enough. But, to borrow a phrase from ’80s prog rock band Asia, “only time will tell.”

~Theron Neel

I Smell a Challenge—It’s Event Time!

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Challenge!Yes, once again, it is Event Time! But don’t let the title of this post worry you. The challenge mentioned above is not for you, my dear readers. I promise you that you will never have to do any heavy lifting at Slammed & Damned. It’s enough that you’re here now, scanning my site as you watch TV over the top of your computer monitor, while texting and listening to your iPod.

No, the challenge I mention is for me alone. As I mentioned HERE, I’ve been having trouble meeting the (imaginary) goal I set for myself when it comes to posting each week. I look around at my fellow bloggers and I’m blown away by the quantity and quality of their posts. I went through a period last year where I posted every day for quite a while, and it almost killed me. I’ve since dropped to posting about three or four times a week—and that’s when I’m on fire. The truth is I’m just not a fast writer. One of my “regular” reviews will often take a full day to finish. I watch the flick. I think about it. If I’m lucky, I rewatch it. Then I write the review. I edit it (often as I’m writing it, which reeeeeeally slows me down). I let it sit a while. I come back and I rewrite it. I reedit it. I post it. Then I start dicking with tweaking it some more. Eventually, I decide I can’t do anything else to it, so I move to a dark corner where I sit weeping and rocking back and forth.

Blood BathI exaggerate. It’s not quite that bad. But, truthfully, I do think I need to post more. And to that end, I’ve come up with a challenge for myself. I hereby declare next week “Euro Horror Week.” Over the course of the week, I will watch and review four European horror flicks. I will. No, really. In fact, I’ve already chosen them. I bought a Euro-horror DVD four-pack several years ago, called Blood Bath, which I have never watched. I think now is the time, my friends. This will allow me to kill several birds with one DVD pack. I get to finally watch these movies and dive into a horror subgenre I’m woefully unfamiliar with. I get to challenge myself, and I get to provide you with something to read. Granted, the writing might be somewhat subpar and frantic. But, hey, what can you expect to result from a viewing frenzy but frenzied views?

Okay, here’s what’s on the menu next week (all descriptions and exclamation points are from the DVD box):

Devil’s Nightmare: A group of tourists, each representing one of the seven deadly sins, spends a terror-filled evening in a castle previously owned by a man who made a pact with Satan. Throw in Euro-beauty Erika Blanc as a homicidal succubus, and you have a truly captivating piece of vintage gothic Belgian/Italian horror.

Pieces: Forty years after a sweet-faced lad axes his mother to death when she catches him doing a nudie puzzle, college girls start meeting their demise at the hands of a chainsaw killer. It seems that he’s assembling another puzzle of a nude woman…only this time the pieces aren’t cardboard!

Kill, Baby…Kill!: A doctor investigating a young woman’s apparent suicide in a Balkan village discovers the locals believe the ghost of a baron’s daughter is responsible. The victims in the small Transylvanian village are being found dead with gold coins planted in their hearts. Director Mario Bava’s chiller stars G. Rossi Stuart and Erika Blanc. This moody and stylish film, filled with horrifically disturbing sequences, is one of Bava’s best!

Kiss Me Kill Me: Nicole is a witch who is out to possess Valentina, a young and beautiful photographer. The young photographer begins to have weird and kinky nightmares and one of her cameras acquires a deadly curse! When Valentina visits the home of Nicole, she discovers bizarre relics, a dominatrix doll and a bottomless pit in the living room. As Valentina begins to understand the strange world she’s being pulled into, Nicole begins a nightmare of her own as a mysterious killer stalks her!

Whew! I hope you’re as Euro-excited as I am! Now, a couple of notes on each film before I go!

First: The term “vintage gothic Belgian/Italian horror” has me both really excited and really questioning the things that excite me!

Second: An axe murderer, a chainsaw killer and nude college coeds in one flick? Again, I’m questioning the things that excite me!

Third: There’s a Mario Bava flick in the group! That’s cool! Let’s see if it’s really “one of Bava’s best!” It’ll be fun!

Fourth: My research tells me that Kiss Me Kill Me is also known as Baba Yaga, a flick I’ve been planning for months to review! So, yay, there’s another dead bird!!!

(Sorry, the exclamation points seem to be contagious!)

All right, there you have it—four films and four reviews in five days. Can I do it? I don’t know. All I can say is I’ve done it before. So, to borrow a phrase from Bill Cosby and Sidney Poitier, “let’s do it again.”

~Theron Neel